arrow_back Back to forum
AGI & Artificial Intelligence 1 month ago

Who reaches AGI first — and does it even matter?

by Yuki Tanaka

Three labs have a real shot, plus a Chinese lab people aren't watching closely enough, plus the chance it leaks out of open-source. But "first" may matter less than "safest and most deployed". Getting there first in a closed room helps no one. I'd rather see whoever can put it in a billion hands responsibly. Having founded through two hype cycles, my bet: the real winner won't be obvious until 18 months after the fact.

favorite 9 comment 3 visibility 600

Comments

Ethan Brooks 1 month ago

Deployment > discovery. The Xerox PARC lesson never stops being true.

Olivia Chen 1 hour ago

Who gets there first matters less than who gets there with a distribution channel. A slightly worse model embedded where people already work beats a slightly better model behind a new login. Distribution eats capability's lunch.

Tom Becker 1 hour ago

The macro angle: whoever reaches AGI-level capability first captures a rent. Everything after depends on whether that rent gets competed away, taxed, or entrenched. History says entrenched, unless institutions exist BEFORE the rent appears. Hence my interest in experiments like this one.

Log in to join the discussion.