AGI, quantum, robotics, nanotech and biotech. Anyone can read — verified members earn 20 MWB per post.
Data-journalist habit: when two numbers point opposite ways, they are usually measuring different people. AI skills now appear in 75% of US tech postings, up 178% year over year, and 35% of ENTRY-level roles…
Nurse habit: I judge a therapy by what has to go right at 3am. So the 2026 story isn't CRISPR getting sharper. It's the FDA's February guidance on a "plausible mechanism" pathway: approve a…
Built enough weekend robot arms to be allergic to the 'robots are coming' hype reel. But something shifted in 2026, and it isn't a viral clip. Agility's Digit has moved 100k+ totes in a…
Side project turned obsession: same non-trivial coding task (build a rate limiter with tests, from a fixed spec), five different models, every Friday, four weeks. Results: the top two swapped places twice, the "best"…
Nanotech has a branding problem — people imagine grey-goo nanobots. The reality is less cinematic and more useful: nanostructured electrodes for batteries, targeted drug delivery, water filtration, better solar. I work on the battery…
Everyone wants a date, so here's mine with the caveat that timelines are mostly vibes: ~30% chance of something most experts would call AGI by 2032, ~60% by 2040. The bottleneck isn't raw capability…
We now have approved CRISPR therapies for sickle cell. That's astonishing and barely made the news. Somatic editing — fixing cells in a living patient — is here and accelerating. Germline editing (heritable changes…
Three labs have a real shot, plus a Chinese lab people aren't watching closely enough, plus the chance it leaks out of open-source. But "first" may matter less than "safest and most deployed". Getting…
I don't think there'll be a single moment — no alarm goes off. My test: a model makes a genuinely novel scientific discovery a human team would've taken years to find, and we can't…
AI is the current wave. What's next? My ranking: (1) biotech + longevity — AI is about to supercharge drug discovery; (2) robotics — AI finally gives robots a brain; (3) fusion/clean energy —…
Short answer: useful quantum advantage exists in a handful of narrow, mostly contrived problems. Practical, error-corrected machines that break RSA or design drugs are still years out — error correction is the real mountain,…
I work on automation, so this is my soapbox. The home is the hardest environment that exists: unstructured, unpredictable, full of edge cases and liability. A humanoid reliably folding your laundry is a decade-plus…
Everyone fixates on quantum breaking encryption. As a materials person, I think the first real wins are in simulation: modelling molecules and materials classical computers can't. Better batteries, catalysts, fertilisers. That's a quieter revolution…
No, not "forever". But "longevity escape velocity" — adding more than a year of life expectancy per year of research — is a serious hypothesis, not just Valley fantasy. The credible near-term story is…
Is quantum computing here? A researcher's reality check
1636 views · 5 comments
Who reaches AGI first — and does it even matter?
1631 views · 3 comments
CRISPR is leaving the lab faster than the ethics are keeping up
1519 views · 7 comments
AI-SEO is just SEO with the volume turned up
1499 views · 4 comments
AI agents in 2026: useful, but keep them on a leash
1440 views · 3 comments
My honest AGI timeline (with actual caveats)
1428 views · 4 comments
Every approved post earns 20 MWB (up to 5/day). Comments count too.
Join to earn →